<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class="">No, Gary. I have not.<div class="">But remember that there is only a single 1.2 inch cutter touching the wood at a time. Not much there to slow the system down, I would think?</div><div class="">Time will tell , for sure!</div><div class="">Thanks for theist.</div><div class="">Tom<br class=""><div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Dec 9, 2017, at 12:14 PM, <a href="mailto:gcw804@aol.com" class="">gcw804@aol.com</a> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><font size="2" face="arial" class="">Tom,
<div class="">Have you read any comparisons of feet per minute with the regular head versus the Byrd head. I would imagine that since there is a blade in constant contact, the Byrd would be a little slower. It wouldn't matter in a home shop, but in a industrial setting, I would think it could add up to a lot more planning time over the course of a year.</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
<div class="">Gary Williams<br class=""></div></div></font></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></div></body></html>